Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720369›Full record

ArticleAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2024

Presentation of enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study in a pediatric and adult clinic.

Sean Hideo Shirata Lanças, Matheus Zanata Brufatto Furlan, Taciana de Albuquerque Pedrosa Fernandes, Sula Glaucia Lage Drumond, Claudia Saad Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Whole-body MRI in arthritis.Skeletal radiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean Hideo Shirata LançasRheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil. sean.lancas@unesp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-0496
Matheus Zanata Brufatto FurlanRheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Taciana de Albuquerque Pedrosa FernandesPediatric Rheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sula Glaucia Lage DrumondRheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia Saad MagalhãesPediatric Rheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises a whole spectrum of chronic arthritis starting before 16 years of age. The study aims to explore the clinical and demographic descriptors, treatment, and disease progression of enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) in comparison with juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis (SpA).

methodsCross-sectional analysis of consecutive patients in two dedicated clinics, with a single visit and retrospective case-notes review. Arthritis, enthesitis and sacroiliitis were evaluated by scoring disease activity and damage. Continuous variables were reported by median, interquartile range; categorical variables were reported by the frequency comparison of the two groups.

resultsThirty-three cases were included, being 23 (69.7%) with ERA. The median age at diagnosis was 12.5 y (SpA) vs. 9 y (ERA) (p < 0.01); the time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 5.5 y (SpA) vs. 1.5 y (ERA) (p < 0.03). In both groups, the predominant presentation was a single joint or < 5 lower limb joints and asymmetric involvement, with a high frequency of enthesitis. There was a higher frequency of mid-tarsal and ankle synovitis in the ERA group and hip involvement in those with SpA. The comparison of the frequency of spine symptoms at presentation, 30% SpA vs. 21.7% ERA (p = 0.7), was not significant, and radiographic progression to spinal involvement occurred in 43.5% of ERA patients. The median time for spinal progression and age at onset was 2.2 and 12 y for ERA, and 4 and 16.5 y for SpA, respectively. Activity and damage scores were not significantly different between the groups. Treatment comparison resulted in 91.3% of ERA and 100% SpA being treated, predominantly with NSAIDs in both groups, followed by DMARDs and biologics, with a higher frequency of biologics in SpA.

conclusionThe main differences were the late diagnoses of SpA, and the hip and spine involvement, with higher frequency of biologic treatment in juvenile-onset SpA compared to ERA.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileDisease ProgressionSpondylarthritisAdolescentAdultAge of OnsetChildCross-Sectional StudiesEnthesopathyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSacroiliitisAntirheumatic AgentsClassificationEnthesitis-related arthritisJuvenile idiopathic arthritisOutcomeSpondyloarthritisSpondyloarthropathy

Identifiers

PMID38720369
PMCPMC13488834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.