Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720271›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2024

Sex differences during development in cortical temporal processing and event related potentials in wild-type and fragile X syndrome model mice.

Katilynne Croom, Jeffrey A Rumschlag, Michael A Erickson, Devin Binder, Khaleel A Razak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Learning impairments in Fmr1Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katilynne CroomGraduate Neuroscience Program, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Jeffrey A RumschlagDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Michael A EricksonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, USA.
Devin BinderGraduate Neuroscience Program, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Khaleel A RazakGraduate Neuroscience Program, University of California, Riverside, USA. khaleel@ucr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-3242

Funding

Translational medicine and mechanistic studies of brain neurophysiology in Fragile X SyndromeU54HD104461 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HUBER, KIMBERLY M. · 2020 to 2024
$8.1M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1U54HD104461-01NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD104461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is currently diagnosed in approximately 1 in 44 children in the United States, based on a wide array of symptoms, including sensory dysfunction and abnormal language development. Boys are diagnosed ~ 3.8 times more frequently than girls. Auditory temporal processing is crucial for speech recognition and language development. Abnormal development of temporal processing may account for ASD language impairments. Sex differences in the development of temporal processing may underlie the differences in language outcomes in male and female children with ASD. To understand mechanisms of potential sex differences in temporal processing requires a preclinical model. However, there are no studies that have addressed sex differences in temporal processing across development in any animal model of ASD.

methodsTo fill this major gap, we compared the development of auditory temporal processing in male and female wildtype (WT) and Fmr1 knock-out (KO) mice, a model of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), a leading genetic cause of ASD-associated behaviors. Using epidural screw electrodes, we recorded auditory event related potentials (ERP) and auditory temporal processing with a gap-in-noise auditory steady state response (ASSR) paradigm at young (postnatal (p)21 and p30) and adult (p60) ages from both auditory and frontal cortices of awake, freely moving mice.

resultsThe results show that ERP amplitudes were enhanced in both sexes of Fmr1 KO mice across development compared to WT counterparts, with greater enhancement in adult female than adult male KO mice. Gap-ASSR deficits were seen in the frontal, but not auditory, cortex in early development (p21) in female KO mice. Unlike male KO mice, female KO mice show WT-like temporal processing at p30. There were no temporal processing deficits in the adult mice of both sexes.

conclusionsThese results show a sex difference in the developmental trajectories of temporal processing and hypersensitive responses in Fmr1 KO mice. Male KO mice show slower maturation of temporal processing than females. Female KO mice show stronger hypersensitive responses than males later in development. The differences in maturation rates of temporal processing and hypersensitive responses during various critical periods of development may lead to sex differences in language function, arousal and anxiety in FXS.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeMice, KnockoutSex CharacteristicsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionAutism Spectrum DisorderFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Autism Spectrum DisordersFrontal CortexHypersensitivityLanguage ImpairmentsNeurodevelopmentSensory Processing DisordersTemporal Processing

Identifiers

PMID38720271
PMCPMC11077726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.