Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720143›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2024

Feasibility and Acceptability of Standardizing Portions in Restaurants.

Deborah A Cohen, Melissa Preciado, Allison Voorhees, Amorette Castillo, Monica Montes, Titilola Labisi, Kelly Lopez, Christina Economos, Mary Story

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deborah A CohenKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. Deborah.a.cohen@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-3739
Melissa PreciadoKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Allison VoorheesKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Amorette CastilloKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Monica MontesNew Health Consultants, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Titilola LabisiKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Kelly LopezKaiser Permanente Research and Evaluation, Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Christina EconomosFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Mary StoryDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Standardizing Portion SizesR34HL149135 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI COHEN, DEBORAH A · 2020 to 2022
$706k
NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL149135NHLBI NIH HHS R34HL149135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most restaurants serve customers excess calories which significantly contributes to the obesity epidemic. This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of offering customers standardized portions to reduce caloric consumption when dining out in three restaurants. Portions were developed to limit quantity of food served, with lunches and dinners ≤ 700 cal and breakfast ≤ 500 cal. Participating restaurants developed an alternative "Balanced Portions Menu." Training and instructions were provided with respect to the volume and weight of food to be plated following the standardized guidelines and providing at least one cup of vegetables per lunch/dinner. We invited local residents to help us evaluate the new menu. We monitored restaurant adherence to guidelines, obtained feedback from customers, and incentivized customers to complete dietary recalls to determine how the new menus might have impacted their daily caloric consumption. Of the three participating restaurants, all had a positive experience after creating the new menus and received more foot traffic. One restaurant that did not want to change portion sizes simply plated the appropriate amount and packed up the rest to-go, marketing the meals as "Dinner today, lunch tomorrow." Two of the restaurants followed the guidelines precisely, while one sometimes plated more rice than the three-fourths cup that was recommended. A significant number of customers ordered from the Balanced Portions menus. Two of the three restaurants have decided to keep offering the Balanced Portions menus indefinitely. Following standardized portions guidelines is both feasible for restaurants and acceptable to customers.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesPortion SizeRestaurantsAdultEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyObesityPilot ProjectsObesityPublic policyRestaurantsStandard portion guidelinesTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID38720143
PMCPMC11329444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.