ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Without ADM Using a Subfascial Approach.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative Infection After Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Risk Factors and Clinical Burden in a Large Single-Center Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The role of bovine pericardium matrix in immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction: Insights from the largest published retrospective series.JPRAS open · 2025Article
- Autologous coverage for direct-to-implant pre-pectoral reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts: a new technique.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmediate prosthetic reconstruction has evolved to a prepectoral position. A technique is described where the pectoral and serratus fascia is raised from superiorly. Initially, Vicryl mesh was used to close the superior fascial defect, but later abandoned by using primary closure for tissue expanders, or creating a pocket in the infraclavicular pectoralis muscle after prosthesis (DTI) insertion. The inframammary fold is also reinforced. Patients with a BMI > 30 have axillary liposuction.
methodRetrospective analysis over a 4-year period. Data included age, number of breasts having expanders or DTI. Prosthetic extrusion and follow-up were recorded. The percentage coverage by fascia was calculated.
resultsForty-seven patients (80 breasts) had mean age of 42 years (range 32-62), twelve patients (19 breasts) had Vicryl mesh inserted, while 35 patients (61 breasts) had closure as noted above. Tissue expanders were inserted in 39 breasts (10 mesh, 29 without). DTI (direct to implant) performed in 41 breasts (32 no mesh, 9 with mesh). Three patients with mesh developed recalcitrant seromas. The mean size of prosthesis used was 353ml (range 200-500 ml). Extrusion occurred in eight breasts (two with mesh, six without). Mean coverage of the prosthesis by fascia was 74% (range 50-100%), and nine patients also had bilateral axillary liposuction of the axillary roll. Mean follow-up was 13 months.
conclusionAnother technique for immediate prosthetic reconstruction providing an additional layer of prosthetic cover in prepectoral plane, without mesh. Applicable for all grades of ptosis. Extrusion rate is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.