ReviewNature communications2024
Critical learning from industrial catalysis for nanocatalytic medicine.
Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- GSH-responsive nanovaccine triggers immunogenic cell death and potent memory T cell immunity for durable, recurrence-free tumor eradication.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Immobilization of glucose oxidase and catalase on magnetite nanoparticles as functional catalyst supports.Journal of materials chemistry. C · 2026Article
- Atomically Precise Clusterzymes: A Programmable Optoelectronic Platform for Neuroscience.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- MOF-Ag Nanozyme forInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Hemoglobin nanocatalyst with tunable autoxidation activity for tumor apoptosis-ferroptosis combination therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
- Metal-organic frameworks as thermocatalysts for hydrogen peroxide generation and environmental antibacterial applications.Science advances · 2025Article
- Living Therapeutics for Synergistic Hydrogen-Photothermal Cancer Treatment by Photosynthetic Bacteria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systematical and critical learning from industrial catalysis will bring inspiration for emerging nanocatalytic medicine, but the relevant knowledge is quite limited so far. In this review, we briefly summarize representative catalytic reactions and corresponding catalysts in industry, and then distinguish the similarities and differences in catalytic reactions between industrial and medical applications in support of critical learning, deep understanding, and rational designing of appropriate catalysts and catalytic reactions for various medical applications. Finally, we summarize/outlook the present and potential translation from industrial catalysis to nanocatalytic medicine. This review is expected to display a clear picture of nanocatalytic medicine evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.