ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Clinical Utility of
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective A dedicated stool container is required for Helicobacter pylori stool antigen testing. If H. pylori fecal antigen can be measured from a fecal occult blood test container (S fecal collection container or S container), which is widely used for colorectal cancer screening, screening of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract can be performed with a single stool sample. We investigated the clinical usefulness of an H. pylori stool antigen assay using an S container. Materials A total of 347 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were included. After the procedure, H. pylori stool antigen was measured using the S container and collection container recommended for H. pylori stool antigen (BL-stool collection container or BL container), and the qualitative outcomes of each were compared. A bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay (BLEIA) was used to measure H. pylori stool antigen. Results The overall agreement between S containers and BL containers was 100% (347/347), indicating that the qualitative outcomes were equivalent. As a secondary analysis, the results of the S container samples were evaluated according to the diagnosis made by physicians, and the overall agreement rate was 99.7% (345/346), indicating a high correlation. Conclusion The detection of H. pylori stool antigen using the S container is clinically useful because the results are equivalent to those obtained by the usual method. Screening of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract is expected to be possible with a single stool sample in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.