Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38719525›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Regional perspectives on patient safety policies and initiatives: a focus group study with patient safety leaders in the Middle East and Asian regions.

Niki O'Brien, Marium Soomro, Alexandra Shaw, Kanwal Latif, Yiwen Wu, Zakiuddin Ahmed, Mike Durkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niki O'BrienImperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK n.obrien@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8389-1448
Marium SoomroRiphah Institute of Healthcare Improvement & Safety (RIHIS), Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Alexandra ShawImperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK.
Kanwal LatifRiphah Institute of Healthcare Improvement & Safety (RIHIS), Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yiwen WuImperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK.
Zakiuddin AhmedRiphah Institute of Healthcare Improvement & Safety (RIHIS), Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mike DurkinImperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventing and reducing risks and harm to patients is of critical importance as unsafe care is a leading cause of death and disability globally. However, the lack of consolidated information on patient safety policies and initiatives at regional levels represents an evidence gap with implications for policy and planning. The aim of the study was to answer the question of what patient safety policies and initiatives are currently in place in the Middle East and Asian regions and what were the main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in developing these. A qualitative approach using online focus groups was adopted. Participants attended focus groups beginning in August 2022. A topic guide was developed using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats framework analysis approach. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used to ensure the recommended standards of qualitative data reporting were met. 21 participants from 11 countries participated in the study. Current patient safety policies identified were categorised across 5 thematic areas and initiatives were categorised across a further 10 thematic areas. Strengths of patient safety initiatives included enabling healthcare worker training, leadership commitment in hospitals, and stakeholder engagement and collaboration. Weaknesses included a disconnect between health delivery and education, implementation gaps, low clinical awareness and buy-in at the facility level, and lack of leadership engagement. Just culture, safety by design and education were considered opportunities, alongside data collection and reporting for research and shared learning. Future threats were low leadership commitment, changing leadership, poor integration across the system, a public-private quality gap and political instability in some contexts. Undertaking further research regionally will enable shared learning and the development of best practice examples. Future research should explore the development of policies and initiatives for patient safety at the provider, local and national levels that can inform action across the system.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsLeadershipPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchAsiaFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle EastSafety ManagementGlobal HealthHealth services researchPatient safetyQualitative researchQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID38719525
PMCPMC11086493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.