ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2024
Medical education with large language models in ophthalmology: custom instructions and enhanced retrieval capabilities.
Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07183111 (Comparison of Traditional Instructions Vs AI Based Instructions With Customized Chat GPT as Remote Support System on Education of Orthodontic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Traditional Instructions Vs AI Based Instructions With Customized Chat GPT as Remote Support System on Education of Orthodontic Patients:A Randomised Control Trial
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Large language models for primary care ophthalmic education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Bibliographic Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Evolving Minds: Natural Learning vs. Artificial Learning in Ophthalmology Training.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence driven transformation of pediatric eye health education based on bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinical documentation with voice processing and large language models: a study on the LAOS system.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- How accurate are ChatGPT-4 responses in chronic urticaria? A critical analysis with information quality metrics.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
- Transforming education: tackling the two sigma problem with AI in journal clubs - a proof of concept.BDJ open · 2025Article
- New frontiers in generative artificial intelligence - enhancing custom GPTs with ophthalmology guidelines.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Can ChatGPT-4o Really Pass Medical Science Exams? A Pragmatic Analysis Using Novel Questions.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Evaluation of large language model-generated medical information on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Chatbots in Ophthalmology: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmic Registration and Clinical Diagnosis: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in graduate medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- A review of ophthalmology education in the era of generative artificial intelligence.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
- Medication counseling for OTC drugs using customized ChatGPT-4: Comparison with ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4o.Digital healthArticle
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Review of Publications from Top Ophthalmology Journals.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- A Pilot Study of a CustomGPT for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists Curriculum 2024.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foundation models are the next generation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to provide novel use cases for healthcare. Large language models (LLMs), a type of foundation model, are capable of language comprehension and the ability to generate human-like text. Researchers and developers have been tuning LLMs to optimise their performance in specific tasks, such as medical challenge problems. Until recently, tuning required technical programming expertise, but the release of custom generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) by OpenAI has allowed users to tune their own GPTs with natural language. This has the potential to democratise access to high-quality bespoke LLMs globally. In this review, we provide an overview of LLMs, how they are tuned and how custom GPTs work. We provide three use cases of custom GPTs in ophthalmology to demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of these tools. First, we present 'EyeTeacher', an educational aid that generates questions from clinical guidelines to facilitate learning. Second, we built 'EyeAssistant', a clinical support tool that is tuned with clinical guidelines to respond to various physician queries. Lastly, we design 'The GPT for GA', which offers clinicians a comprehensive summary of emerging management strategies for geographic atrophy by analysing peer-reviewed documents. The review underscores the significance of custom instructions and information retrieval in tuning GPTs for specific tasks in ophthalmology. We also discuss the evaluation of LLM responses and address critical aspects such as privacy and accountability in their clinical application. Finally, we discuss their potential in ophthalmic education and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.