Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38719329›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Bacterial growth in patients with low back pain and Modic changes: protocol of a multicentre, case-control biopsy study.

Mads Peder Rolfsen, Karianne Wiger Gammelsrud, Ansgar Espeland, Lars Christian Bråten, Sverre Bugge Mjønes, Ivar Austevoll, Filip Celestyn Dolatowski, Maren Bjerke Årrestad, Monika Kolskår Toppe, Ingvild Elise Orlien and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406624 (Epigenetic and Molecular Biomarkers in Chronic Low Back Pain and Modic Changes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03406624 completednot on this map

Epigenetic and Molecular Biomarkers in Chronic Low Back Pain and Modic Changes

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2018 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsLow Back PainArmsBiopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mads Peder RolfsenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway madrol@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-2803
Karianne Wiger GammelsrudDepartment of Microbiology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ansgar EspelandDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lars Christian BråtenFORMI, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-2556
Sverre Bugge MjønesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
Ivar AustevollKysthospitalet in Hagavik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Filip Celestyn DolatowskiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Maren Bjerke ÅrrestadDepartment of Orthopaedics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Monika Kolskår ToppeDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ingvild Elise OrlienDepartment of Microbiology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mona Holberg-PetersenDepartment of Microbiology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Morten FagerlandBiostatistics & Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
John-Anker ZwartDepartment of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kjersti StorheimDepartment of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christian HellumDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBacterial infection and Modic changes (MCs) as causes of low back pain (LBP) are debated. Results diverged between two randomised controlled trials examining the effect of amoxicillin with and without clavulanic acid versus placebo on patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) and MCs. Previous biopsy studies have been criticised with regard to methods, few patients and controls, and insufficient measures to minimise perioperative contamination. In this study, we minimise contamination risk, include a control group and optimise statistical power. The main aim is to compare bacterial growth between patients with and without MCs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, case-control study examines disc and vertebral body biopsies of patients with cLBP. Cases have MCs at the level of tissue sampling, controls do not. Previously operated patients are included as a subgroup. Tissue is sampled before antibiotic prophylaxis with separate instruments. We will apply microbiological methods and histology on biopsies, and predefine criteria for significant bacterial growth, possible contamination and no growth. Microbiologists, surgeons and pathologist are blinded to allocation of case or control. Primary analysis assesses significant growth in MC1 versus controls and MC2 versus controls separately. Bacterial disc growth in previously operated patients, patients with large MCs and growth from the vertebral body in the fusion group are all considered exploratory analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (REC South East, reference number 2015/697) has approved the study. Study participation requires written informed consent. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03406624). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and patient fora. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03406624.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBacterial InfectionsBiopsyCase-Control StudiesHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeMulticenter Studies as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsBack painDiagnostic microbiologyMICROBIOLOGYORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYSpine

Identifiers

PMID38719329
PMCPMC11086543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.