Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38719321›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Efficiency assessment of follow-up methodology of patients with knee replacement to predict post-surgical functionality: a protocol for randomised control PROKnee trial.

Constanza San Martín Valenzuela, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos, Alfonso Payá Rubio, Patricia Correa-Ghisays, José-Francisco Pedrero-Sánchez, Antonio Silvestre Muñoz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04850300 (Efficiency Assessment of the Methodology for the Follow-up of Patients With Knee Prostheses), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04850300 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Efficiency Assessment of the Methodology for the Follow-up of Patients With Knee Prostheses

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled99ConditionsTotal Knee ArthroplastyArmsTotal knee prosthesis with medial condylar stabilization, Total knee prosthesis with central pivot stabilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Constanza San Martín ValenzuelaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-5442
Rafael Tabarés-SeisdedosCentro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain Rafael.Tabares@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1089-2204
Alfonso Payá RubioDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia / INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Patricia Correa-GhisaysCentro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-7349
José-Francisco Pedrero-SánchezInstituto de Biomecánica, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Silvestre MuñozDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia / INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEven when total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an extended treatment, most patients experience a suboptimal evolution after TKA. The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to determine the effectiveness of two different prosthesis stabilisation systems on the functionality in activities of daily life, and (2) to determine prognostic biomarkers of knee prosthesis function based on radiological information, quantification of cytokines, intra-articular markers and biomechanical functional evaluation to predict successful evolution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PROKnee trial was designed as a randomised controlled patient-blinded trial with two parallel groups that are currently ongoing. The initial recruitment will be 99 patients scheduled for their first TKA, without previous prosthesis interventions in lower limbs, who will be randomly divided into two groups that differed in the stabilisation methodology incorporated in the knee prosthesis: the MEDIAL-pivot group and the CENTRAL-pivot group. The maximum walking speed will be reported as the primary outcome, and the secondary results will be patient-reported questionnaires related to physical status, cognitive and mental state, radiological test, laboratory analysis and biomechanical instrumented functional performance, such as the 6-minute walking test, timed up-and-go test, gait, sit-to-stand, step-over, and ability to step up and down stairs. All the results will be measured 1 week before TKA and at 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee for Research with Medicines of the University Clinical Hospital of Valencia on 8 October 2020 (order no. 2020/181). Participants are required to provide informed consent for the study and for the surgical procedure. All the data collected will be treated confidentially since they will be blinded and encrypted. The results from the trial will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals, regardless of whether these results are negative or inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04850300).

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionKneePhysical ExaminationREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID38719321
PMCPMC11086404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.