Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38719304›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

COS-PPA: protocol to develop a core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia.

Anna Volkmer, David A Copland, Maya L Henry, Jason D Warren, Rosemary Varley, Sarah J Wallace, Chris Jd Hardy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Communication partner training for aged-care workers: A scoping review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna VolkmerDepartment of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK a.volkmer.15@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-409X
David A CoplandQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Maya L HenryDepartments of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences and Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jason D WarrenDementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-0826
Rosemary VarleyDepartment of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah J WallaceQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-9343
Chris Jd HardyDementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4900-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe term primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language-led dementias. Disease-modifying treatments that delay, slow or reverse progression of PPA are currently lacking, though a number of interventions to manage the symptoms of PPA have been developed in recent years. Unfortunately, studies exploring the effectiveness of these interventions have used a variety of different outcome measures, limiting comparability. There are more constructs, apart from word retrieval, that are important for people with PPA that have not received much attention in the research literature. Existing core outcome sets (COS) for dementia and non-progressive aphasia do not meet the needs of people with PPA, highlighting a need to develop a specific COS for PPA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a three-stage study to identify a COS for PPA interventions in research and clinical practice. The stage 1 systematic review will identify existing speech, language and communication measures used to examine the effectiveness of interventions for PPA in the research literature. Employing a nominal group technique, stage 2 will identify the most important outcomes for people with PPA and their families. The data collected in stages 1 and 2 will be jointly analysed with the project PPI group and will inform the stage 2 modified Delphi consensus study to identify a core outcome measurement set for PPA among a range of research disciplines undertaking intervention studies for people with PPA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for stage 2 of the study has been sought individually in each country at collaborating institutions and is stated in detail in the manuscript. Stage 3 has been granted ethical approval by the Chairs of UCL Language and Cognition Department Ethics, Project ID LCD-2023-06. Work undertaken at stages 1, 2 and 3 will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journal articles and presented at international scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022367565.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveResearch DesignConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSystematic Reviews as Topicdementiapatient reported outcome measuresspeech pathology

Identifiers

PMID38719304
PMCPMC11086495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.