ArticleBiophysical reports2024
Estimation of the mass density of biological matter from refractive index measurements.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical diffraction tomographic microscopy: a cutting-edge label-free three-dimensional bioimaging.Biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Optical Measurement of the Mass Density of Biological Samples.ACS photonics · 2025Article
- Beyond Water Content: Unraveling Stiffness in Hydrated Materials by a Correlative Brillouin-Raman Approach.ACS photonics · 2025Article
- Micromechanical behavior of the apple fruit cuticle investigated by Brillouin light scattering microscopy.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Optical characterization of molecular interaction strength in protein condensates.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Optical characterization of molecular interaction strength in protein condensates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantification of physical properties of biological matter gives rise to novel ways of understanding functional mechanisms. One of the basic biophysical properties is the mass density (MD). It affects the dynamics in sub-cellular compartments and plays a major role in defining the opto-acoustical properties of cells and tissues. As such, the MD can be connected to the refractive index (RI) via the well known Lorentz-Lorenz relation, which takes into account the polarizability of matter. However, computing the MD based on RI measurements poses a challenge, as it requires detailed knowledge of the biochemical composition of the sample. Here we propose a methodology on how to account for assumptions about the biochemical composition of the sample and respective RI measurements. To this aim, we employ the Biot mixing rule of RIs alongside the assumption of volume additivity to find an approximate relation of MD and RI. We use Monte-Carlo simulations and Gaussian propagation of uncertainty to obtain approximate analytical solutions for the respective uncertainties of MD and RI. We validate this approach by applying it to a set of well-characterized complex mixtures given by bovine milk and intralipid emulsion and employ it to estimate the MD of living zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae trunk tissue. Our results illustrate the importance of implementing this methodology not only for MD estimations but for many other related biophysical problems, such as mechanical measurements using Brillouin microscopy and transient optical coherence elastography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.