Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718263›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Results of a 6-Month Field Trial of a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.

Craig Formby, Dana Cherri, Carrie A Secor, Steve Armstrong, Roger Juneau, Peter Hutchison, David A Eddins

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Device and Fitting Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  2. Background and Rationale for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Counseling Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Craig FormbyAuditory and Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Dana CherriAuditory and Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Carrie A SecorAuditory and Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Steve ArmstrongSoundsGood Labs, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Roger JuneauSoftTouch Labs, Harahan, LA.
Peter HutchisonAuditory and Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
David A EddinsAuditory and Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.ORCID 0000-0003-3716-2436

Funding

Toward a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating HyperacusisR21DC015054 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., FORMBY, CHARLES CRAIG · 2016 to 2017
$423k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe present results from a 6-month field trial of a transitional intervention for debilitating primary hyperacusis, including a combination of structured counseling; promotion of safe, comfortable, and healthy sound exposure; and therapeutic broadband sound from sound generators. This intervention is designed to overcome barriers to successful delivery of therapeutic sound as a tool to downregulate neural hyperactivity in the central auditory pathways (i.e., the maladaptive mechanism believed to account for primary hyperacusis) and, together with the counseling, reduce the associated negative emotional and physiological reactions to debilitating hyperacusis.

methodTwelve adults with normal or near-normal audiometric thresholds, complaints consistent with their pretreatment loudness discomfort levels ≤ 75 dB HL at multiple frequencies, and hearing questionnaire scores ≥ 24 completed the sound therapy-based intervention. The low-level broadband therapeutic sound was delivered by ear-level devices fitted bilaterally with either occluding earpieces and output-limiting loudness suppression (LS; to limit exposure to offensive sound levels) or open domes to maximize comfort and exposure to sound therapy. Thresholds for LS (primary outcome) were incrementally adjusted across six monthly visits based on treatment-driven change in loudness judgments for running speech in sound field. Secondary outcomes included categorical loudness judgments, speech understanding, and questionnaires to assess the hyperacusis problem, quality of life, and depression. An exit survey assessed satisfaction with and benefit from the intervention and the counseling, therapeutic sound, and LS components.

resultsThe mean change in LS (34.8 dB) was highly significant (effect size = 2.045). Eleven of 12 participants achieved ≥ 16-dB change in LS, consistent with highly significant change in sound-based questionnaire scores. Exit surveys indicated satisfaction with and benefit from the intervention.

conclusionThe transitional intervention was successful in improving the hyperacusis conditions of 11 of 12 study participants while reducing their sound avoidance behaviors and reliance on sound protection.

Indexed as

HyperacusisAdultAuditory ThresholdCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38718263
PMCPMC11192563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.