Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718262›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Device and Fitting Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.

David A Eddins, Steve Armstrong, Roger Juneau, Peter Hutchison, Dana Cherri, Carrie A Secor, Craig Formby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Results of a 6-Month Field Trial of a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Trial
  2. Background and Rationale for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Counseling Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A EddinsAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Steve ArmstrongSoundsgood Labs, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Roger JuneauSoftTouch Labs, Harahan, LA.
Peter HutchisonAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Dana CherriAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Carrie A SecorAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Craig FormbyAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa.

Funding

Toward a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating HyperacusisR21DC015054 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., FORMBY, CHARLES CRAIG · 2016 to 2017
$423k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis report describes a hearing device and corresponding fitting protocol designed for use in a transitional intervention for debilitating loudness-based hyperacusis.

methodThe intervention goal is to transition patients with hyperacusis from their typical counterproductive sound avoidance behaviors (i.e., sound attenuation and limited exposure to healthy low-level sounds) into beneficial sound therapy treatment that can expand their dynamic range to the point where they can tolerate everyday sounds and experience an improved quality of life. This requires a combination of counseling and sound therapy, the latter of which is provided via the hearing device technology, signal processing, and precision fitting approach described in this report. The device combines a miniature behind-the-ear sound processor and a custom earpiece designed to maximize the attenuation of external sounds. Output-limiting loudness suppression is used to restrict exposure to offending high-level sounds while unity gain amplification maximizes exposure to healthy and tolerable lower level sounds. The fitting process includes measurement of the real-ear unaided response, the real-ear measurement (REM) system noise floor, the real-ear occluded response, real-ear insertion gain, and the output limit. With these measurements, the device can achieve the prescribed unity gain needed to provide transparent access to comfortable sound levels. It also supports individualized configuration of the therapeutic noise from an on-board sound generator and adaptive output limiting based on treatment-induced increases in dynamic range. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe utility of this device and fitting protocol, in combination with structured counseling, is highlighted in the outcomes of a successful 6-month trial of the transitional intervention described in a companion report in this issue.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHyperacusisLoudness PerceptionEar Protective DevicesEquipment DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID38718262
PMCPMC11192565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.