Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718225›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Chainsaw: protein domain segmentation with fully convolutional neural networks.

Jude Wells, Alex Hawkins-Hooker, Nicola Bordin, Ian Sillitoe, Brooks Paige, Christine Orengo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Family-level specialization in protein domain insertion architectures.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Slice'N'Dice: maximizing the value of predicted models for structural biologists.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Semi-supervised segmentation of RNA 3D structures using density-based clustering.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jude WellsCentre for Artificial Intelligence, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-2310
Alex Hawkins-HookerCentre for Artificial Intelligence, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Nicola BordinInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6568-9035
Ian SillitoeInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1091-9144
Brooks PaigeCentre for Artificial Intelligence, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Christine OrengoInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

EPSRC EP/S021566/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein domains are fundamental units of protein structure and play a pivotal role in understanding folding, function, evolution, and design. The advent of accurate structure prediction techniques has resulted in an influx of new structural data, making the partitioning of these structures into domains essential for inferring evolutionary relationships and functional classification.

resultsThis article presents Chainsaw, a supervised learning approach to domain parsing that achieves accuracy that surpasses current state-of-the-art methods. Chainsaw uses a fully convolutional neural network which is trained to predict the probability that each pair of residues is in the same domain. Domain predictions are then derived from these pairwise predictions using an algorithm that searches for the most likely assignment of residues to domains given the set of pairwise co-membership probabilities. Chainsaw matches CATH domain annotations in 78% of protein domains versus 72% for the next closest method. When predicting on AlphaFold models, expert human evaluators were twice as likely to prefer Chainsaw's predictions versus the next best method. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: github.com/JudeWells/Chainsaw.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerProtein DomainsProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID38718225
PMCPMC11256964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.