Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718169›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2025

The Selah trial: A preference-based partially randomized waitlist control study of three stress management interventions.

Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, David E Eagle, Logan C Tice, Alyssa Platt, Jia Yao, Jessie S Larkins, Eunsoo Timothy Kim, Joshua A Rash

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04625777 (Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcomes Testing to Reduce Stress Symptoms Among Clergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04625777 nacompletednot on this map

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcomes Testing to Reduce Stress Symptoms Among Clergy

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled390ConditionsOccupational StressArmsMindfulness Based Stress Reduction, Daily Examen spiritual practice, Stress inoculation combination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rae Jean Proeschold-BellDuke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2008-3053
David E EagleDuke Department of Sociology, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research.ORCID 0000-0003-4909-9497
Logan C TiceDuke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Alyssa PlattDuke Global Health Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham NC 27705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-0170
Jia YaoDuke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-577X
Jessie S LarkinsDuke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Eunsoo Timothy KimDuke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Joshua A RashDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-0712

Funding

Duke Endowment ORC-2096-SP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic stress undermines psychological and physiological health. We tested three remotely delivered stress management interventions among clergy, accounting for intervention preferences. United Methodist clergy in North Carolina enrolled in a partially randomized, preference-based waitlist control trial. The interventions were: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), Daily Examen prayer practice, and Stress Proofing (stress inoculation plus breathing skills). Co-primary outcomes were symptoms of stress (Calgary Symptoms of Stress Inventory) and 48-hour ambulatory heart rate variability (HRV) at 12 weeks compared to waitlist control. Survey data were collected at 0, 12, and 24 weeks and 48-hour ambulatory HRV at 0 and 12 weeks. The 255 participants were 91% White and 48% female. Forty-nine participants (22%) without a preference were randomly assigned between the three interventions (n = 40) and waitlist control (n = 9). Two hundred six participants (78%) with a preference were randomly assigned to waitlist control (n = 62) or their preferred intervention (n = 144). Compared to waitlist control, MBSR [mean difference (MD) = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.20; P < .001] and Stress Proofing (MD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.40, -0.14; P < .001) participants had lower stress symptoms at 12 weeks; Daily Examen participants did not until 24 weeks (MD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.08). MBSR participants demonstrated improvement in HRV at 12 weeks (MD = +3.32 ms; 95% CI: 0.21, 6.44; P = .036). MBSR demonstrated robust improvement in self-reported and objective physical correlates of stress; Stress Proofing and Daily Examen resulted in improvements in self-reported correlates of stress. These brief practices were sustainable and beneficial for United Methodist clergy during the heightened stressors of the COVID pandemic. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04625777.

Indexed as

ClergyMindfulnessStress, PsychologicalAdultCOVID-19FemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth Carolinaheart rate variabilitymindfulnessoccupational stressprayerstress managementvagal tone

Identifiers

PMID38718169
PMCPMC11756318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.