Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718118›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Learning the effective order of a hypergraph dynamical system.

Leonie Neuhäuser, Michael Scholkemper, Francesco Tudisco, Michael T Schaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hypernetworks induce stable hyperlocking.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Not your private tête-à-tête: leveraging the power of higher-order networks to study animal communication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Connectivity of Random Geometric Hypergraphs.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonie NeuhäuserRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-7031
Michael ScholkemperRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-8119
Francesco TudiscoGSSI Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila, Italy.
Michael T SchaubRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-6404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamical systems on hypergraphs can display a rich set of behaviors not observable for systems with pairwise interactions. Given a distributed dynamical system with a putative hypergraph structure, an interesting question is thus how much of this hypergraph structure is actually necessary to faithfully replicate the observed dynamical behavior. To answer this question, we propose a method to determine the minimum order of a hypergraph necessary to approximate the corresponding dynamics accurately. Specifically, we develop a mathematical framework that allows us to determine this order when the type of dynamics is known. We use these ideas in conjunction with a hypergraph neural network to directly learn the dynamics itself and the resulting order of the hypergraph from both synthetic and real datasets consisting of observed system trajectories.

Identifiers

PMID38718118
PMCPMC11078196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.