Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718081›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Traffic trajectory data analysis technology based on HMM model map matching algorithm.

Mingkang Sun, Xiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingkang SunGlasgow College, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610000, China.ORCID 0009-0000-4611-938X
Xiang LiSiemens Industrial Automation Products Ltd. Chengdu, Chengdu, 611730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of traffic trajectory data and the development of positioning technology have driven the demand for its analysis. However, in the current application scenarios, there are some problems such as the deviation between positioning data and real roads and low accuracy of existing trajectory data traffic prediction models. Therefore, a map matching algorithm based on hidden Markov models is proposed in this study. The algorithm starts from the global route, selects K nearest candidate paths, and identifies candidate points through the candidate paths. It uses changes in speed, angle, and other information to generate a state transition matrix that match trajectory points to the actual route. When processing trajectory data in the experiment, K = 5 is selected as the optimal value, the algorithm takes 51 ms and the accuracy is 95.3%. The algorithm performed well in a variety of road conditions, especially in parallel and mixed road sections, with an accuracy rate of more than 96%. Although the time loss of this algorithm is slightly increased compared with the traditional algorithm, its accuracy is stable. Under different road conditions, the accuracy of the algorithm is 98.3%, 97.5%, 94.8% and 96%, respectively. The accuracy of the algorithm based on traditional hidden Markov models is 95.9%, 95.7%, 95.4% and 94.6%, respectively. It can be seen that the accuracy of the algorithm designed has higher precision. The experiment proves that the map matching algorithms based on hidden Markov models is superior to other algorithms in terms of matching accuracy. This study makes the processing of traffic trajectory data more accurate.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMarkov ChainsData AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID38718081
PMCPMC11078395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.