Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38718026›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Enhancing spinal bone anchor pull-out resistance with an L-shaped anchor.

Esther Paula de Kater, Michiel Norbert Blom, Teunis Cornelis van Doorn, Quoc Huy Tieu, David Justin Jager, Aimée Sakes, Paul Breedveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esther Paula de KaterDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5342-6721
Michiel Norbert BlomDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Teunis Cornelis van DoornDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Quoc Huy TieuDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
David Justin JagerDepartment of Electronic and Mechanical Support Division, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Aimée SakesDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-884X
Paul BreedveldDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Bio-Inspired Technology Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success rate of spinal fusion surgery is mainly determined by the fixation strength of the spinal bone anchors. This study explores the use of an L-shaped spinal bone anchor that is intended to establish a macro-shape lock with the posterior cortical layer of the vertebral body, thereby increasing the pull-out resistance of the anchor. The performance of this L-shaped anchor was evaluated in lumbar vertebra phantoms (L1-L5) across four distinct perpendicular orientations (lateral, medial, superior, and inferior). During the pull-out experiments, the pull-out force, and the displacement of the anchor with respect to the vertebra was measured which allowed the determination of the maximal pull-out force (mean: 123 N ± 25 N) and the initial pull-out force, the initial force required to start motion of the anchor (mean: 23 N ± 16 N). Notably, the maximum pull-out force was observed when the anchor engaged the cortical bone layer. The results demonstrate the potential benefits of utilising a spinal bone anchor featuring a macro-shape lock with the cortical bone layer to increase the pull-out force. Combining the macro shape-lock fixation method with the conventional pedicle screw shows the potential to significantly enhance the fixation strength of spinal bone anchors.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansPedicle ScrewsSuture Anchors

Identifiers

PMID38718026
PMCPMC11078376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.