Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717992›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2024

Influence of Fiber Diameter of Polycaprolactone Nanofibrous Materials on Biofilm Formation and Retention of Bacterial Cells.

Simona Lencova, Marta Stindlova, Kristyna Havlickova, Vera Jencova, Vaclav Peroutka, Katerina Navratilova, Kamila Zdenkova, Hana Stiborova, Sarka Hauzerova, Eva Kuzelova Kostakova and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Fiber Diameter and Surface Topography of PCL Nanofibers onJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Microarchitecture ofACS omega · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Simona LencovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-5944
Marta StindlovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristyna HavlickovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Vera JencovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7391-9526
Vaclav PeroutkaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-1063
Katerina NavratilovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0009-5487-2553
Kamila ZdenkovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8170-3263
Hana StiborovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3424-4225
Sarka HauzerovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Eva Kuzelova KostakovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5758-3206
Ondrej JankovskyDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague Czech Republic.
Pavel KejzlarDepartment of Advanced Materials, Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
David LukasDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Katerina DemnerovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2050-4073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop microbiologically safe nanofibrous materials, it is crucial to understand their interactions with microbial cells. Current research indicates that the morphology of nanofibers, particularly the diameter of the fibers, may play a significant role in biofilm formation and retention. However, it has not yet been determined how the fiber diameter of poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL), one of the most widely used biopolymers, affects these microbial interactions. In this study, two nanofibrous materials electrospun from PCL (PCL45 and PCL80) with different fiber diameter and characteristic distance δ between fibers were compared in terms of their ability to support or inhibit bacterial biofilm formation and retain bacterial cells. Strains of

Indexed as

BiofilmsEscherichia coliNanofibersPolyestersStaphylococcus aureuspolycaprolactonePolyestersbacteriabiofilmmorphologynanofiberspolycaprolactoneretention

Identifiers

PMID38717992
PMCPMC11129108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.