Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717909›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Importance of resection margin after resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy: population-based cohort study.

Emil Östrand, Jenny Rystedt, Jennie Engstrand, Petter Frühling, Oskar Hemmingsson, Per Sandström, Malin Sternby Eilard, Bobby Tingstedt, Pamela Buchwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emil ÖstrandDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7621-9541
Jenny RystedtDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-9963
Jennie EngstrandDivision of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-7022
Petter FrühlingDepartment of Surgery, Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oskar HemmingssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1732-168X
Per SandströmDepartment of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Malin Sternby EilardDepartment of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-7726
Bobby TingstedtDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-8276
Pamela BuchwaldDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-5552

Funding

Erik och Angelica Sparres forskningsstiftelse
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResection margin has been associated with overall survival following liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. The aim of this study was to examine how resection margins of 0.0 mm, 0.1-0.9 mm and ≥1 mm influence overall survival in patients resected for colorectal liver metastasis in a time of modern perioperative chemotherapy and surgery.

methodsUsing data from the national registries Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and Swedish National Quality Registry for Liver, Bile Duct and Gallbladder Cancer, patients that had liver resections for colorectal liver metastasis between 2009 and 2013 were included. In patients with a narrow or unknown surgical margin the original pathological reports were re-reviewed. Factors influencing overall survival were analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsA total of 754 patients had a known margin status, of which 133 (17.6%) patients had a resection margin <1 mm. The overall survival in patients with a margin of 0 mm or 0.1-0.9 mm was 42 (95% c.i. 31 to 53) and 48 (95% c.i. 35 to 62) months respectively, compared with 75 (95% c.i. 65 to 85) for patients with ≥1 mm margin, P < 0.001. Margins of 0 mm or 0.1-0.9 mm were associated with poor overall survival in the multivariable analysis, HR 1.413 (95% c.i. 1.030 to 1.939), P = 0.032, and 1.399 (95% c.i. 1.025 to 1.910), P = 0.034, respectively.

conclusionsDespite modern chemotherapy the resection margin is still an important factor for the survival of patients resected for colorectal liver metastasis, and a margin of ≥1 mm is needed to achieve the best possible outcome.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionRegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSweden

Identifiers

PMID38717909
PMCPMC11078257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.