Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717857›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

DNA lesion bypass and the stochastic dynamics of transcription-coupled repair.

Michael D Nicholson, Craig J Anderson, Duncan T Odom, Sarah J Aitken, Martin S Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Topographical archetypes of somatic mutagenesis in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RNA polymerase tracking along damaged DNA: Impact on DNA repair and mutagenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael D NicholsonCancer Research United Kingdom Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-4072
Craig J AndersonMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.
Duncan T OdomDivision of Regulatory Genomics and Cancer Evolution (B270), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Sarah J AitkenCancer Research United Kingdom Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1897-4140
Martin S TaylorMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-330X

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27589Cancer Research UK (CRUK) 20412 A22398Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C157/A27589EC | European Research Council (ERC) 615584 788937Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_00035/2UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00007/11 MC_UU_00035/UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) RG94521Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (WT) WT202878/B/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations and disruption to gene expression. The stalling of RNA polymerase II (RNAP) at sites of DNA damage and the subsequent triggering of repair processes have major roles in shaping the genome-wide distribution of mutations, clearing barriers to transcription, and minimizing the production of miscoded gene products. Despite its importance for genetic integrity, key mechanistic features of this transcription-coupled repair (TCR) process are controversial or unknown. Here, we exploited a well-powered in vivo mammalian model system to explore the mechanistic properties and parameters of TCR for alkylation damage at fine spatial resolution and with discrimination of the damaged DNA strand. For rigorous interpretation, a generalizable mathematical model of DNA damage and TCR was developed. Fitting experimental data to the model and simulation revealed that RNA polymerases frequently bypass lesions without triggering repair, indicating that small alkylation adducts are unlikely to be an efficient barrier to gene expression. Following a burst of damage, the efficiency of transcription-coupled repair gradually decays through gene bodies with implications for the occurrence and accurate inference of driver mutations in cancer. The reinitation of transcription from the repair site is not a general feature of transcription-coupled repair, and the observed data is consistent with reinitiation never taking place. Collectively, these results reveal how the directional but stochastic activity of TCR shapes the distribution of mutations following DNA damage.

Indexed as

DNA DamageRNA Polymerase IITranscription, GeneticAlkylationAnimalsDNAExcision RepairHumansMiceMutationStochastic ProcessesDNARNA Polymerase IIdamagemathematical modelingmutationrepairtranscription

Identifiers

PMID38717857
PMCPMC11098089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.