ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Comparative Probiogenomics Analysis of Limosilactobacillus fermentum 3872.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Insights Into the Probiotic and Safety Attributes of Pediococcus acidilactici BC-7 for its Potential Application in Livestock Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotics unveiled: bridging general health benefits to the era of precision medicine.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Phenotypic, Genomic, and In Vivo Characterization of a Host-Derived Limosilactobacillus fermentum RLF77 with Potential to Prevent Post-weaning Diarrhea in Rabbits.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Application and Research Prospects of CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing Technology in Lactic Acid Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Probiotic Properties of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei UFTM 2.9 Through Probiogenomic Analysis.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
- Characterisation of probiotic potential and whole genome analysis of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tetragonula Laeviceps and Heterotrigona Itama bee bread.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Genomic Characterisation of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CRL2085 Unveiling Probiotic Traits for Application in Cattle Feed.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Deciphering probiotic potential: a comprehensive guide to probiogenomic analyses.Future microbiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limosilactobacillus fermentum is an important member of the lactic acid bacteria group and holds immense potential for probiotic properties in human health and relevant industries. In this study, a comparative probiogenomic approach was applied to analyze the genome sequence of L. fermentum 3872, which was extracted from a commercially available yogurt sample, along with 20 different publicly available strains. Results indicate that the genome size of the characterized L. fermentum 3892 strain is 2,057,839 bp, with a single- and circular-type chromosome possessing a G + C content of 51.69%. The genome of L. fermentum 3892 strain comprises a total of 2120 open reading frames (ORFs), two genes encoding rRNAs, and 53 genes encoding tRNAs. Upon comparative probiogenomic analysis, two plasmid sequences were detected among the study strains, including one for the L. fermentum 3872 genome, which was found between position 1,288,203 and 1,289,237 with an identity of 80.98. The whole-genome alignment revealed 2223 identical sites and a pairwise identity of 98.9%, indicating a significant difference of 1.1% among genome strains. Comparison of amino acid encoding genes among strains included in this study suggests that the strain 3872 exhibited the highest degree of amino acids present, including glutamine, glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, lysine, threonine, methionine, and cysteine. The comparative antibiotic resistome profiling revealed that strain 3872 exhibited a high resistant capacity only to ciprofloxacin antibiotics as compared to other strains. This study provides a genomic-based evaluation approach for comparative probiotic strain analysis in commercial foods and their significance to human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38717735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.