Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717682›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A new sample-size planning approach for person-specific VAR(1) studies: Predictive accuracy analysis.

Jordan Revol, Ginette Lafit, Eva Ceulemans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan RevolResearch Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. jordan.revol@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-3617
Ginette LafitMethodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-128X
Eva CeulemansResearch Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7611-4683

Funding

Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders Grand awarded to Eva Ceulemans (FWO; Project No. GResearch Council of KU Leuven Grant awarded to Eva Ceulemans (C14/19/054; iBOF/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers increasingly study short-term dynamic processes that evolve within single individuals using N = 1 studies. The processes of interest are typically captured by fitting a VAR(1) model to the resulting data. A crucial question is how to perform sample-size planning and thus decide on the number of measurement occasions that are needed. The most popular approach is to perform a power analysis, which focuses on detecting the effects of interest. We argue that performing sample-size planning based on out-of-sample predictive accuracy yields additional important information regarding potential overfitting of the model. Predictive accuracy quantifies how well the estimated VAR(1) model will allow predicting unseen data from the same individual. We propose a new simulation-based sample-size planning method called predictive accuracy analysis (PAA), and an associated Shiny app. This approach makes use of a novel predictive accuracy metric that accounts for the multivariate nature of the prediction problem. We showcase how the values of the different VAR(1) model parameters impact power and predictive accuracy-based sample-size recommendations using simulated data sets and real data applications. The range of recommended sample sizes is smaller for predictive accuracy analysis than for power analysis.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansResearch DesignSample SizeAutoregressive modelsIntensive longitudinal designsMonte Carlo simulationPower analysisPredictive accuracySample-size planning method

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.