Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717667›Full record

SynthesisAdministration and policy in mental health2025

Effect of Psychosocial Interventions on Children and Youth Emotion Regulation: A Meta-Analysis.

Kristin Espenes, Anita J Tørmoen, Kristian Rognstad, Karianne H Nilsen, Pamela M Waaler, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, John Kjøbli

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristin EspenesCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway. kristin.espenes@r-bup.no.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-9975
Anita J TørmoenNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristian RognstadCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
Karianne H NilsenCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
Pamela M WaalerCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
Tore Wentzel-LarsenCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
John KjøbliCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postbox 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 262789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effect of psychosocial interventions on emotion regulation outcomes in children and youth (0-23 years). We conducted a meta-analysis using a three-level modeling approach extracting multiple effect-sizes from experimental and quasi-experimental studies. We included 40 interventions from 35 publications involving 3,891 participants and extracted 258 posttreatment effect sizes. Analyses were performed to assess intervention effects on emotion regulation, moderating effects of inclusion of acceptance focus and other potential moderators. Additionally, we examined intervention effects on mental health outcomes. Interventions showed a significant small-to-medium effect on emotion regulation (d = 0.37, 95% CI [0.22, 0.51], p < .001). Similar effects on were found regardless of acceptance-focus. Interventions significantly associated with a higher level of effect (p ≤ 0.045) included ACT, DBT, CBT and behavior parent training interventions. Significant small-to-medium effects were found for mental health outcomes (d = 0.39, 95% CI [0.25, 0.53], p < .001), with a correlation of .56 between overall outcomes across domains. Meta-regression results indicated that psychosocial interventions are moderately effective in improving emotion regulation, with no significant difference in inclusion of acceptance-focus. Findings suggest that emotion regulation is a transdiagnostic process that may inform the development of more beneficial interventions.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationPsychosocial InterventionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantYoung AdultChildrenEmotion regulationMental HealthTransdiagnosticYouth

Identifiers

PMID38717667
PMCPMC12449357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.