Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717619›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Cardiac output calculation using the Liljestrand and Zander formula: is this method applicable during immediate transition after birth? - A post hoc analysis.

Daniel Pfurtscheller, Bernhard Schwaberger, Nina Höller, Nariae Baik-Schneditz, Lukas Schober, Marlies Bruckner, Christoph Schlatzer, Berndt Urlesberger, Gerhard Pichler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel PfurtschellerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Bernhard SchwabergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Nina HöllerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Nariae Baik-SchneditzDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Lukas SchoberDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Marlies BrucknerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Christoph SchlatzerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Berndt UrlesbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Gerhard PichlerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria. gerhard.pichler@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life is a critical period for neonates. Assessing the cardiovascular transition during this period immediately after birth is crucial but challenging. The present study compares adjusted estimated cardiac output values calculated by the Liljestrand and Zander formula (COest/adj LaZ) with non-invasively measured cardiac output values (CO-bioimpedance) during immediate transition after birth. We performed a secondary outcome analysis of a prospective observational study in preterm and term neonates. Ten and 15 min after birth, arterial blood pressure and heart rate were assessed, and CO-bioimpedance was measured using electrical bioimpedance method (Aesculon monitor, Osypka, Germany). We calculated COest/adj LaZ and compared it to CO-bioimpedance. Further, we performed a correlation analysis. Thirty-two neonates with a median (IQR) gestational age of 37.0 (32.0-39.4) weeks were included. Mean ± SD CO-bioimpedance was 0.62 ± 0.15 l/min, and COest/adj LaZ was calculated to be 0.64 ± 0.10 l/min, whereby both correlated significantly (p = 0.025, r = 0.359) with each other.  Conclusion: The present study demonstrates high comparability of COest/adj LaZ and CO-bioimpedance in neonates during immediate transition after birth, suggesting that cardiac output can be derived in a cost-effective and feasible manner if other methods are not available. What is Known: • Echocardiography is considered the gold standard for non-invasive CO evaluation, but its feasibility during the immediate transition period is limited. What is New: • Non-invasive methods such as CO-bioimpedance for cardiac output (CO) measurement and the Liljestrand and Zander (LaZ) formula for estimating CO offer promising alternatives during the immediate transition period.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputElectric ImpedanceFemaleGestational AgeHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleProspective StudiesCardiac outputLiljestrand and ZanderNeonateNICOMTransition period

Identifiers

PMID38717619
PMCPMC11263242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.