Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717606›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Prediction of long-term visual outcome of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole surgery using optical coherence tomography parameters that estimate potential preoperative photoreceptor damage.

Beáta Bajdik, Attila Vajas, Gréta Kemenes, Mariann Fodor, Éva Surányi, Lili Takács

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beáta BajdikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila VajasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gréta KemenesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Mariann FodorDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Éva SurányiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Lili TakácsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei Krt 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary. ltakacs@med.unideb.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-0154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters that predict postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and are based on recent understanding of the pathomechanism of idiopathic full thickness macular hole (iFTMH) formation and closure.

methodsA retrospective consecutive case series of patients who had macular hole (MH) surgery at our institution between 2016 and 2022 was performed. 32 eyes of 30 patients were selected with at least 12 months of follow-up, closed MH and good quality OCT at each visit. Univariate correlation analysis, multiple logistic regression with forward stepwise selection, and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) were used to identify the best predictors for postoperative BCVA at 6 and 12 months (M), and final (≥ 12 M) visits, and a new OCT index was created. Abilities of best models/indices to predict < 0.30 logMAR (> 20/40) BCVA were compared to macular hole index (MHI) using the area under the receiver operating curve (AU-ROC) analysis.

resultsStatistical analysis revealed base diameter (B) (6 M), preoperative BCVA and B (12 M) and smaller ELM-GCL distance (A), and B (final visit) as predictors for postoperative BCVA. AU-ROC analysis indicated greatest AUC at 6 M for MHI and B (0.797, p = 0.004 and 0.836 p = 0.001, respectively) and for the new A/B index at 12 M and final visit (0.844, p = 0.002 and 0.913, p = 0.003, respectively).

conclusionOur study suggests that MHI and B can be useful predictors of short term BCVA while the new A/B index that incorporates OCT parameters indicating potential preoperative photoreceptor damage may be a good predictor for long term postoperative BCVA. Our findings support the theory that initial hole formation mechanisms and photoreceptor damage define visual prognosis.

Indexed as

Retinal PerforationsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebratePostoperative PeriodPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective StudiesIdiopathic full thickness macular holeOptical coherence tomographyVision prediction

Identifiers

PMID38717606
PMCPMC11458759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.