ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Assessment of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic [Molecular neurodegeneration · 2026Article
- Feasibility of short imaging protocols for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Detection of Focal Lesions in Epilepsy with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- [18F]fluorodeprenyl-D2 PET can detect and monitor astrogliosis in anti-LGI1-IgG autoimmune encephalitis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Longitudinal monitoring of tau aggregation in progressive supranuclear palsy with [Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Developing a novel reference region for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Kinetic modeling ofEJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Radiosynthesis,ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose[
methodsIn the first part of the study, we validated AIF derived from radial artery whole blood against IDIF by investigating 20 subjects (ten controls and ten patients). IDIF were generated by manual extraction of the carotid artery using the average and the five highest (max5) voxel intensity values and by automated extraction of the carotid artery using the average and the maximum voxel intensity value. In the second part of the study, IDIF quantification using the IDIF with the closest match to the AIF was transferred to group comparison of a large independent cohort of 40 subjects (15 healthy controls, 15 PSP patients and 10 AD patients). We compared V
resultsAIF and IDIF showed highly correlated input curves for all applied IDIF extraction methods (0.78 < r < 0.83, all p < 0.0001; area under the curves (AUC): 0.73 < r ≤ 0.82, all p ≤ 0.0003). Regarding the V
conclusionBlood-free IDIF is a promising approach for quantification of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.