Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717515›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Comparison of Different Fusion Radiomics for Predicting Benign and Malignant Sacral Tumors: A Pilot Study.

Fei Zheng, Ping Yin, Kewei Liang, Tao Liu, Yujian Wang, Wenhan Hao, Qi Hao, Nan Hong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fei ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Ping YinDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Kewei LiangIntelligent Manufacturing Research Institute, Visual 3D Medical Science and Technology Development, Fengtai District, No. 186 South Fourth Ring Road West, Beijing, 100071, People's Republic of China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Yujian WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Wenhan HaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Qi HaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Nan HongDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China. hongnan1968@163.com.

Funding

Beijing United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging Foundation CRIBJQY202105National Natural Science Foundation of China 82001764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiating between benign and malignant sacral tumors is crucial for determining appropriate treatment options. This study aims to develop two benchmark fusion models and a deep learning radiomic nomogram (DLRN) capable of distinguishing between benign and malignant sacral tumors using multiple imaging modalities. We reviewed axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) of 134 patients pathologically confirmed as sacral tumors. The two benchmark fusion models were developed using fusion deep learning (DL) features and fusion classical machine learning (CML) features from multiple imaging modalities, employing logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor classification, and extremely randomized trees. The two benchmark models exhibiting the most robust predictive performance were merged with clinical data to formulate the DLRN. Performance assessment involved computing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). The DL benchmark fusion model demonstrated superior performance compared to the CML fusion model. The DLRN, identified as the optimal model, exhibited the highest predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.889 and an AUC of 0.961 in the test sets. Calibration curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive capability of the models, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to assess the clinical net benefit of the DLR model. The DLRN could serve as a practical predictive tool, capable of distinguishing between benign and malignant sacral tumors, offering valuable information for risk counseling, and aiding in clinical treatment decisions.

Indexed as

SacrumSpinal NeoplasmsAdultAgedDeep LearningDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPilot ProjectsRadiomicsROC CurveDeep learningMultimodality imagingNomogramRadiomicsSacral tumors

Identifiers

PMID38717515
PMCPMC11522258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.