ArticleJMIR aging2024
Technology Use Among Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability of an Intervention to Prevent Older Adult Mistreatment Among Family Caregivers to Persons With Dementia: Multimethod Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Adoption and Use of a Smart Home Connected Care System by Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Multicomponent Behavior Change Technique Intervention for Caregivers of People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Protocol for a Single-Arm, Personalized Behavioral Trial to Disrupt Sedentary Time.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Multidimensional Digital Literacy and Quality of Life Among Informal Care Dyads in Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Providing Tech Support as Care Work Among Care Workers in Assisted Living Facilities: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- AI-enhanced culturally tailored intervention for Latino family caregivers of persons living with dementia: a feasibility study.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Exploring service demands of community-embedded elderly care based on the Kano model: a cross-sectional study in Hefei, China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Conditional acceptance of emotion-recognition-enabled smart care devices for home-based rehabilitation and elderly care: a dual-perspective survey of prospective users and family caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Digital inclusion, legal governance, and the adoption of smart care services by older adults in China: an evolutionary game analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Engaging Older Adults to Guide the Development of Passive Home Health Monitoring to Support Aging in Place.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Human-Robot Interactions to Support Healthy Aging-in-Place.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025Review
- A Smartphone App for the Management of Postoperative Home Recovery After Thoracic Surgery Procedures: A Pilot Study Using the Care4Today™ App.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Advancing user-centric design and technology adoption for aging populations: a multifaceted approach.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Clinical Utility of an Occupational Therapist-Led Smart Home Modification Program: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Informal caregivers are called upon to provide substantial care, but more needs to be known about technology use among older adult and caregiver dyads. Objective: This study described technology use among older adults and their caregivers, explored potential correlates of technology use, and highlighted implications for practice. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among unpaid caregivers of older adults (n=486). Primary outcomes were self-reported technology (devices and functions) use among caregivers and their oldest care recipient. The concordance of technology use among caregivers and care recipients was also examined. Multivariable regression models were conducted separately for caregivers and care recipients. Results: Greater proportions of caregivers used all examined technologies, except for the medication alerts or tracking function, than care recipients. Caregivers used an average of 3.4 devices and 4.2 functions, compared to 1.8 devices and 1.6 functions used by their care recipients. Among caregivers, younger age, higher income, and higher education were associated with more technology use (P<.05). Among care recipients, younger age, not having cognitive dysfunction, and caregiver's technology use were associated with more technology use (P<.05). Conclusions: Understanding technology use patterns and device adoption across diverse caregiver and care recipient populations is increasingly important for enhancing geriatric care. Findings can guide recommendations about appropriate technology interventions and help providers communicate and share information more effectively with patients and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.