Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717278›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024

Int&in: A machine learning-based web server for active split site identification in inteins.

Mirko Schmitz, Jara Ballestin Ballestin, Junsheng Liang, Franziska Tomas, Leon Freist, Karsten Voigt, Barbara Di Ventura, Mehmet Ali Öztürk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A transposon-like strategy for proteins.Nature chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Int&in: A machine learning-based web server for active split site identification in inteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirko SchmitzBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-9379-6590
Jara Ballestin BallestinBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Junsheng LiangBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Franziska TomasBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Leon FreistInstitute of Biology III, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Karsten VoigtInstitute of Biology III, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Barbara Di VenturaBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0247-9989
Mehmet Ali ÖztürkBIOSS and CIBSS Research Signalling Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-1402

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 422681845Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101002044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inteins are proteins that excise themselves out of host proteins and ligate the flanking polypeptides in an auto-catalytic process called protein splicing. In nature, inteins are either contiguous or split. In the case of split inteins, the two fragments must first form a complex for the splicing to occur. Contiguous inteins have previously been artificially split in two fragments because split inteins allow for distinct applications than contiguous ones. Even naturally split inteins have been split at unnatural split sites to obtain fragments with reduced affinity for one another, which are useful to create conditional inteins or to study protein-protein interactions. So far, split sites in inteins have been heuristically identified. We developed Int&in, a web server freely available for academic research (https://intein.biologie.uni-freiburg.de) that runs a machine learning model using logistic regression to predict active and inactive split sites in inteins with high accuracy. The model was trained on a dataset of 126 split sites generated using the gp41-1, Npu DnaE and CL inteins and validated using 97 split sites extracted from the literature. Despite the limited data size, the model, which uses various protein structural features, as well as sequence conservation information, achieves an accuracy of 0.79 and 0.78 for the training and testing sets, respectively. We envision Int&in will facilitate the engineering of novel split inteins for applications in synthetic and cell biology.

Indexed as

InteinsInternetMachine LearningProtein SplicingSoftwareCatalytic DomainAesCL inteingp41‐1machine learningNpu DnaEprotein engineeringsplit inteinssplit site prediction

Identifiers

PMID38717278
PMCPMC11078102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.