Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717246›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2025

Occupational nerve injuries.

Sandra L Hearn, Shawn P Jorgensen, Joelle M Gabet, Gregory T Carter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Occupational nerve injuries.Muscle & nerve · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra L HearnDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-697X
Shawn P JorgensenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Joelle M GabetDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8637-4509
Gregory T CarterDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Providence St Lukes Rehabilitation Medical Center, St Luke's Rehabilitation Institute, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine at Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-4750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational nerve injuries span a broad array of pathologies and contribute toward functional limitation, disability, and economic impact. Early and accurate recognition, treatment, and management of workplace factors rely on a thorough understanding of the anatomic and biomechanical factors that drive nerve injury. This review explores the interplay between anatomy, biomechanics, and nerve pathology common to occupational nerve injury and provides the treating physician with a rational, evidence-based approach to diagnosis and to occupational aspects of management. Assessment of potential occupational nerve injury begins with a detailed understanding of the employee's work duties through a biomechanical lens. One must consider likelihood of occupational causation while accounting for predisposing conditions or preexisting symptoms. Beyond overt crush injury or laceration, potential mechanisms of nerve injury, with effects compounded over time, include compression, stretch, vibration, and repetitive or high-force movements of regional muscles and joints. Injury often occurs at nerve locations that experience higher pressures, changes in pressure over time, or abrupt changes in trajectory, often near a tethered point. This understanding, coupled with condition-specific knowledge presented in this review, equips managing physicians to diagnose occupational nerve injury and enhance treatment recommendations with rational activity modifications or equipment that can protect the nerve or decrease likelihood of continued injury. Long-term management often involves follow-up to assess effectiveness of interventions in the setting of the work environment, with gradual progression of the worker toward return to unrestricted duty or to a point of maximal medical improvement.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesOccupational InjuriesPeripheral Nerve InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumanselectrodiagnostic testingfunctional recoveryguidelinesnerve injuryoccupational medicinerecoverywork related

Identifiers

PMID38717246
PMCPMC11998973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.