Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716750›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Overcoming therapeutic challenges: Successful management of a supposedly triple seronegative, refractory generalized myasthenia gravis patient with efgartigimod.

Benedetta Sorrenti, Christian Laurini, Luca Bosco, Camilla Mirella Maria Strano, Marina Scarlato, Matteo Gastaldi, Massimo Filippi, Stefano Carlo Previtali, Yuri Matteo Falzone

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Efgartigimod improves non-AChR generalized Myasthenia Gravis: a real world experience.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benedetta SorrentiNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Christian LauriniNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Luca BoscoNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Camilla Mirella Maria StranoNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marina ScarlatoNeurorehabilitation Unit, Quarenghi Clinical Institute, San Pellegrino Terme,, Italy.
Matteo GastaldiNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-2000
Massimo FilippiNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-0479
Stefano Carlo PrevitaliNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2546-4357
Yuri Matteo FalzoneNeuroimmunology Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study was undertaken to highlight neonatal Fc receptor inhibition (efgartigimod) as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) and to emphasize the concept that seronegative MG is greatly constrained by the limitations of currently available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures.

methodsWe describe the first refractory, generalized MG (gMG) patient successfully treated with efgartigimod after testing negative on standard autoantibody detection tests.

resultsOur patient presented with severe fluctuating bulbar and generalized weakness, resulting in multiple myasthenic crises requiring intubation. After a 28-year medical history of multiple failed lines of treatment, our patient was started on efgartigimod. Over five treatment cycles, a definite improvement in her clinical condition was observed (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class: IIIb to IIb; MG-Activities of Daily Living score: 11 to 0; MG-Quality of Life 15 score: 30 to 0; Quantitative MG score: 28 to 6). Standard autoantibody detection tests failed to detect known pathogenic autoantibodies, but cell-based assay (CBA) identified autoantibodies against clustered adult acetylcholine receptor (AChR).

conclusionsIn light of recent approvals of efgartigimod by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration exclusively for AChR-positive gMG forms, our case highlights evidence suggesting that such an approach might be shortsighted and could limit therapeutic options for patients with refractory seronegative gMG. Additionally, introducing more sensitive analytical techniques, exemplified by CBA, may help bridge the gap between seronegative and seropositive patients. This represents an urgent unmet need for gMG patients, as the antibody profile dramatically influences the therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Myasthenia GravisAutoantibodiesFemaleHumansReceptors, CholinergicReceptors, FcAutoantibodiesReceptors, CholinergicReceptors, Fcbiological drugscase reportcell‐based assayefgartigimodFcRn inhibitorsmyasthenia gravisrefractory

Identifiers

PMID38716750
PMCPMC11236002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.