Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716749›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

The relevance and accuracy of an AI algorithm-based descriptor on 23 facial attributes in a diverse female US population.

Zhi Yu, Frederic Flament, Ruowei Jiang, Jeff Houghton, Camille Kroely, Nathalie Cabut, Diala Haykal, Cassidy Sehgal, Nina G Jablonski, Aurelie Jean and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The relevance and accuracy of an AI algorithm-based descriptor on 23 facial attributes in a diverse female US population.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhi YuModiface - A L'Oréal Group Company, Toronto, Canada.
Frederic FlamentL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Clichy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-9535
Ruowei JiangModiface - A L'Oréal Group Company, Toronto, Canada.
Jeff HoughtonModiface - A L'Oréal Group Company, Toronto, Canada.
Camille KroelyL'Oréal CDO - Digital Service Factory, Clichy, France.
Nathalie CabutL'Oréal CDO - Digital Service Factory, Clichy, France.
Diala HaykalCentre Médical Laser Esthétique, Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-5088
Cassidy SehgalL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Clark, USA.
Nina G JablonskiDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aurelie JeanHult International Business School, Cambridge, USA.
Parham AarabiModiface - A L'Oréal Group Company, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

L'Oreal Research & Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe response of AI in situations that mimic real life scenarios is poorly explored in populations of high diversity.

objectiveTo assess the accuracy and validate the relevance of an automated, algorithm-based analysis geared toward facial attributes devoted to the adornment routines of women.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, two diversified groups presenting similar distributions such as age, ancestry, skin phototype, and geographical location was created from the selfie images of 1041 female in a US population. 521 images were analyzed as part of a new training dataset aimed to improve the original algorithm and 520 were aimed to validate the performance of the AI. From a total 23 facial attributes (16 continuous and 7 categorical), all images were analyzed by 24 make-up experts and by the automated descriptor tool.

resultsFor all facial attributes, the new and the original automated tool both surpassed the grading of the experts on a diverse population of women. For the 16 continuous attributes, the gradings obtained by the new system strongly correlated with the assessment made by make-up experts (r ≥ 0.80; p < 0.0001) and supported by a low error rate. For the seven categorical attributes, the overall accuracy of the AI-facial descriptor was improved via enrichment of the training dataset. However, some weaker performance in spotting specific facial attributes were noted.

conclusionIn conclusion, the AI-automatic facial descriptor tool was deemed accurate for analysis of facial attributes for diverse women although some skin complexion, eye color, and hair features required some further finetuning.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFaceAdolescentAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPhotographyReproducibility of ResultsSkin PigmentationUnited StatesYoung AdultageAI‐automatic facial descriptorancestrydiverse womenfacial attributesskin phototype

Identifiers

PMID38716749
PMCPMC11077572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.