Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716734›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

Modulation of innate immune response to mRNA vaccination after SARS-CoV-2 infection or sequential vaccination in humans.

Fredrika Hellgren, Anja Rosdahl, Rodrigo Arcoverde Cerveira, Klara Lenart, Sebastian Ols, Yong-Dae Gwon, Seta Kurt, Anna Maria Delis, Gustav Joas, Magnus Evander and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical and translational evaluation of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fredrika HellgrenDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anja RosdahlDepartment of Infectious Diseases and.
Rodrigo Arcoverde CerveiraDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klara LenartDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sebastian OlsDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yong-Dae GwonDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Seta KurtDepartment of Clinical Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Anna Maria DelisDepartment of Clinical Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Gustav JoasDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus EvanderDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johan NormarkDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Clas AhlmDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Mattias Ne ForsellDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sara CajanderDepartment of Infectious Diseases and.
Karin LoréDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mRNA vaccines are likely to become widely used for the prevention of infectious diseases in the future. Nevertheless, a notable gap exists in mechanistic data, particularly concerning the potential effects of sequential mRNA immunization or preexisting immunity on the early innate immune response triggered by vaccination. In this study, healthy adults, with or without documented prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, were vaccinated with the BNT162b2/Comirnaty mRNA vaccine. Prior infection conferred significantly stronger induction of proinflammatory and type I IFN-related gene signatures, serum cytokines, and monocyte expansion after the prime vaccination. The response to the second vaccination further increased the magnitude of the early innate response in both study groups. The third vaccination did not further increase vaccine-induced inflammation. In vitro stimulation of PBMCs with TLR ligands showed no difference in cytokine responses between groups, or before or after prime vaccination, indicating absence of a trained immunity effect. We observed that levels of preexisting antigen-specific CD4 T cells, antibody, and memory B cells correlated with elements of the early innate response to the first vaccination. Our data thereby indicate that preexisting memory formed by infection may augment the innate immune activation induced by mRNA vaccines.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesImmunity, InnateSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAdultAntibodies, ViralCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticAdaptive immunityImmunologyInnate immunityVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38716734
PMCPMC11141904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.