Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716458›Full record

ReviewAnalytical science advances2021

Recent trends in the chromatographic analysis of volatile flavor and fragrance compounds: Annual review 2020.

Stefan Louw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Volatile Compounds Profiling of FreshMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan LouwDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Namibia Windhoek Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3122-8812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chromatographic analysis of volatile flavor and fragrance compounds is performed routinely in several industries and in many fields of scientific research. Typical applications include food-, environmental-, essential oil- and cosmetics analysis. Even though the analysis of flavors and fragrances have become increasingly standardized during the past decade, there are still a large variety of techniques that can be used for their extraction, chemical analysis, and sensory analysis. Moreover, there are certain less commonly used techniques that are now being used with increased frequency and that are showing the potential of being used as alternatives to the existing standard techniques. In this annual review, the techniques that were most commonly used in 2020 for the investigation of these volatile compounds are discussed. In addition, a number of emerging trends are discussed, notably the use of solvent assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) for extraction, GC ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) for volatile compound analysis and electronic senses, that is, E-noses and E-tongues, for sensory analysis. Miscellaneous hyphenated techniques, advances in stationary phase chemistry and a number of interesting applications are also highlighted.

Indexed as

Electronic noseelectronic tonguegas chromatographyheadspace analysision mobility spectrometrysolvent assisted flavor evaporation

Identifiers

PMID38716458
PMCPMC10989567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.