Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716448›Full record

ReviewAnalytical science advances2021

30

Delphine Zanella, Jean-François Focant, Flavio A Franchina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. 30Analytical science advances · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Delphine ZanellaMolecular System, Organic & Biological Analytical Chemistry Group University of Liège Liège Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-2837
Jean-François FocantMolecular System, Organic & Biological Analytical Chemistry Group University of Liège Liège Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-2920
Flavio A FranchinaMolecular System, Organic & Biological Analytical Chemistry Group University of Liège Liège Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7236-4266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we report on the latest (2020-Early 2021) instrumental advances and applications of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC), including its hyphenation with novel upstream or downstream processes (sample preparation approaches or detection technologies). We also discuss software and analysis workflow developments necessary to elaborate the dense chemical information obtained. Thirty years after its inception, the use of GC×GC, as the main analytical tool or as a complementary platform, is undoubtedly shifting toward more applied challenges in a vast breadth of applications. Therefore, we consider the major fields (energy, fuel, foodstuff, plant, biological, and environmental) in which GC×GC has been successfully used, discussing some of the recent innovative research works.

Indexed as

aroma analysisfingerprintingGC×GCmass spectrometrymetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID38716448
PMCPMC10989587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.