Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716404›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Influencing attitudes towards antimicrobial use and resistance in companion animals-the impact on pet owners of a short animation in a randomized controlled trial.

Emma Wright, Lisbeth Rem Jessen, Alice Tompson, Catherine Rutland, David Singleton, Ian Battersby, Isuru Gajanayake, Margo Mosher, Sharon Pfleger, Toby Gemmill and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Emma WrightThe Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2863-4265
Lisbeth Rem JessenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Alice TompsonDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Catherine RutlandSimplyhealth, Hambledon House, Waterloo Court, Andover, Hampshire, SP10 1LQ, UK.
David SingletonInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ian BattersbyMars Veterinary Health, 18101 SE 6th Way, Vancouver, WA, 98683, USA.
Isuru GajanayakeWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4NH, UK.
Margo MosherMars Veterinary Health, 18101 SE 6th Way, Vancouver, WA, 98683, USA.
Sharon PflegerNHS Highland, Public Health Directorate, Larch House, Stoneyfield Business Park, Inverness, IV2 7PA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-6378
Toby GemmillWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4NH, UK.
Tim SparksWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham on the Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Tina M SørensenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Fergus AllertonWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4NH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-3307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a vital One Health issue; the rational use of antimicrobials is essential to preserve their efficacy. Veterinarians cite pressure from pet owners as a contributor to antimicrobial prescription. Engaging pet owners in antimicrobial stewardship could reduce this pressure. A short educational animation could facilitate communication of this message. The impact of the animation on participant's opinions relating to antimicrobial prescribing and awareness of AMR was assessed via a randomized controlled trial. Methods: A survey was created based on the health belief model. Owners attending six UK veterinary centres were randomized to the intervention or control group (ratio 1:1). All owners completed an agreement level survey of two questions followed by 18 statements scored using a Likert agreement scale. The control group responded without interruption, whereas the animation group was shown the animation after answering the first two questions and five statements. Results: In total, 647 owners participated in the study; 350 complete responses were analysed. Responses to 10 of 13 statements asked after the animation were significantly different (all Conclusions: Pet owners that watched a short AMR engagement animation displayed greater awareness of the impact of AMR and were more likely to support measures in line with antimicrobial stewardship. This behavioural-nudge resource could support owners towards contributing to a multi-faceted approach to AMR.

Identifiers

PMID38716404
PMCPMC11073752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.