Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716403›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Clinical significance of cefazolin inoculum effect in serious MSSA infections: a systematic review.

Calvin Ka-Fung Lo, Ashwin Sritharan, Jiesi Zhang, Nicole Li, Cindy Zhang, Frank Wang, Mark Loeb, Anthony D Bai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptibleAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cefazolin Versus Flucloxacillin for Methicillin-SusceptibleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Calvin Ka-Fung LoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-736X
Ashwin SritharanMichael G. DeGroote Undergraduate School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jiesi ZhangFaculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Nicole LiFaculty of Arts and Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Cindy ZhangFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Frank WangMichael G. DeGroote Undergraduate School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mark LoebDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-5390
Anthony D BaiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-9934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE) is a phenomenon whereby some MSSA isolates demonstrate resistance to cefazolin when a high bacterial inoculum is used for susceptibility testing. The clinical significance of this phenotypic phenomenon remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review to answer the following question: In patients with serious MSSA infection treated with cefazolin, does infection due to CzIE-positive MSSA isolates result in worse clinical outcomes than infection due to CzIE-negative MSSA isolates? Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, medRxiv and bioRxiv were searched from inception until 12 April 2023. Studies were included if they tested for CzIE in clinical isolates from MSSA infections in humans. Two independent reviewers extracted data and conducted risk-of-bias assessment. Main outcomes were treatment failure and mortality. Pooling of study estimates was not performed given the heterogeneity of patient populations and outcome definitions. Results: Twenty-three observational studies were included. CzIE presence amidst MSSA isolates ranged from 0% to 55%. There was no statistically significant mortality difference in two studies that compared MSSA infections with and without CzIE, with ORs ranging from 0.72 to 19.78. Of four studies comparing treatment failure, ORs ranged from 0.26 to 13.00. One study showed a significantly higher treatment failure for the CzIE group, but it did not adjust for potential confounders. Conclusions: The evidence on CzIE is limited by small observational studies. In these studies, CzIE did not predict higher mortality in MSSA infections treated with cefazolin. Our findings do not support CzIE testing in clinical practice currently.

Identifiers

PMID38716403
PMCPMC11073751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.