Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716383›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Impact of drone-specific dispatch instructions on the safety and efficacy of drone-delivered emergency medical treatments: A randomized simulation pilot study.

Emma E Davidson, Jason A Correll, Adam Gottula, Laura R Hopson, Thomas B Leith, Noor K Majhail, Emily J Mathias, James M Pribble, Nathan B Roberts, Isabella G Scott and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Emma E DavidsonUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 426 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Jason A CorrellUniversity of Michigan Medical School, 1515 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Adam GottulaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Laura R HopsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Thomas B LeithDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Noor K MajhailEmergent Health Partners, LLC, 1200 State Circle, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA.
Emily J MathiasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
James M PribbleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Nathan B RobertsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Isabella G ScottEmergent Health Partners, LLC, 1200 State Circle, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA.
James A CranfordDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Nathaniel HuntDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Christine M BrentDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medical drones have potential for improving the response times to out-of-hospital emergencies. However, widespread adoption is hindered by unanswered questions surrounding medical dispatch and bystander safety. This study evaluated the impact of novel drone-specific dispatch instructions (DSDI) on bystanders' ability to interact effectively with a medical drone and provide prompt, safe, and high-quality treatment in a simulated emergency scenario. We hypothesized DSDI would improve bystanders' performance and facilitate safer bystander-drone interactions. Methods: Twenty-four volunteers were randomized to receive either DSDI and standard Medical Priority Dispatch (MPD) instructions or MPD alone in a simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or pediatric anaphylaxis., Results: The addition of DSDI did not lead to statistically significant changes to the overall time to provide care in either the anaphylaxis or OHCA simulations. However, DSDI did have an impact on bystander safety. In the MPD only group, 50% (6/12) of participants ignored the audio and visual safety cues from the drone instead of waiting for it to be declared safe compared to no DSDI participants ignoring these safety cues. Conclusions: All participants successfully provided patient care. However, this study indicates that DSDI may be useful to ensure bystander safety and should be incorporated in the continued development of emergency medical drones.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCPRDispatch instructionDroneEpinephrine auto-injectorOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID38716383
PMCPMC11074964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.