Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716381›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Emergency front-of-neck access in cardiac arrest: A scoping review.

Mohammed Aljanoubi, Abdulkarim A Almazrua, Samantha Johnson, Ian R Drennan, Joshua C Reynolds, Jasmeet Soar, Keith Couper, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced Life Support Taskforce

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AljanoubiWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abdulkarim A AlmazruaWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Samantha JohnsonThe Library, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ian R DrennanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua C ReynoldsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Jasmeet SoarSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Keith CouperWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced Life Support Taskforce

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach. Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest. Methods: In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas: incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications. Results: The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16-56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest. Conclusion: The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

CricothyroidotomyEmergency front-of-neck accessEndotracheal intubationHeart arrestOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID38716381
PMCPMC11074978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.