Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716375›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Impact of ABCB1 and ABCG2 Transporter in Outcome of Gallbladder Cancer.

Nimisha, Sundeep S Saluja, Abhay K Sharma, Phani K Nekarakanti, Apurva, Arun Kumar, Ejaj Ahmad, Syed A Husain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

NimishaCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Sundeep S SalujaCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Abhay K SharmaCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Phani K NekarakantiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
ApurvaCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Arun KumarCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Ejaj AhmadCentral Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Syed A HusainDepartment of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a biologically aggressive malignancy requiring appropriate biomarkers to improve its outcome. Role of ABC transporters (ABCB1 and ABCG2) has been linked to cancer aggressiveness, tumorigenesis and multidrug resistance. Herein, we studied the prognostic implication of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in GBC. Methods: Fresh tissue (tumour & normal) samples collected from 54 patients who underwent R0 resection, were analysed for mRNA and protein expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 by quantitative Real-Time PCR and western blotting, respectively, in this prospective study. The molecular findings were correlated with clinical-pathological parameters using χ2 and fisher exact test. The molecular changes in ABCB1 and ABCG2 were analysed for predicting overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and response to chemotherapy using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 50 ± 13.2 with 26 (48.1%) in patients having early stage gallbladder cancer (GBC). Over-expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 was noted in 32/54 (59%) and 40/54 (74%) cases, respectively. The protein expression of ABCB1(P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (BCRP) was higher in 27/54 (50%) and 37/54 (59%) cases, respectively. The mean OS and DFS was 20.7 ± 11.5 and 19.3 ± 12.2 months at median follow-up of 24 months. The TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and presence of gallstone were significant factors for predicting OS and DFS on multivariate analysis. Both ABCB1 and ABCG2 did not show any significant correlation with OS and DFS with similar incidences of late death and recurrence among over-expression and down-expression. Sub-group comparison suggests that change in expression pattern of ABCB1 and ABCG2 may not affect response to chemotherapy in GBC. Conclusion: Altered expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 may not be a useful prognostic marker for survival or response to chemotherapy in GBC. Presently, histo-pathological characteristics and associated gallstones are the important predictors for survival and recurrence in GBC.

Indexed as

ABCB1ABCG2ABC transporterschemotherapygallbladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID38716375
PMCPMC11070335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.