ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Using artificial intelligence methods to study the effectiveness of exercise in patients with ADHD.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying artificial intelligence in neurodevelopmental disorders management and research.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Review
- The Role of Physical Activity in ADHD Management: Diagnostic, Digital and Non-Digital Interventions, and Lifespan Considerations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the genetic and socioeconomic interplay between ADHD and anxiety disorders using Mendelian randomization.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly affects children and adults worldwide, characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Current research in this field faces challenges, particularly in accurate diagnosis and effective treatment strategies. The analysis of motor information, enriched by artificial intelligence methodologies, plays a vital role in deepening our understanding and improving the management of ADHD. The integration of AI techniques, such as machine learning and data analysis, into the study of ADHD-related motor behaviors, allows for a more nuanced understanding of the disorder. This approach facilitates the identification of patterns and anomalies in motor activity that are often characteristic of ADHD, thereby contributing to more precise diagnostics and tailored treatment strategies. Our approach focuses on utilizing AI techniques to deeply analyze patients' motor information and cognitive processes, aiming to improve ADHD diagnosis and treatment strategies. On the ADHD dataset, the model significantly improved accuracy to 98.21% and recall to 93.86%, especially excelling in EEG data processing with accuracy and recall rates of 96.62 and 95.21%, respectively, demonstrating precise capturing of ADHD characteristic behaviors and physiological responses. These results not only reveal the great potential of our model in improving ADHD diagnostic accuracy and developing personalized treatment plans, but also open up new research perspectives for understanding the complex neurological logic of ADHD. In addition, our study not only suggests innovative perspectives and approaches for ADHD treatment, but also provides a solid foundation for future research exploring similar complex neurological disorders, providing valuable data and insights. This is scientifically important for improving treatment outcomes and patients' quality of life, and points the way for future-oriented medical research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.