Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716252›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Using artificial intelligence methods to study the effectiveness of exercise in patients with ADHD.

Dan Yu, Jia Hui Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan YuThe College of Education and Liberal Arts, Adamson University, Manila, Philippines.
Jia Hui FangMedical Faculty, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly affects children and adults worldwide, characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Current research in this field faces challenges, particularly in accurate diagnosis and effective treatment strategies. The analysis of motor information, enriched by artificial intelligence methodologies, plays a vital role in deepening our understanding and improving the management of ADHD. The integration of AI techniques, such as machine learning and data analysis, into the study of ADHD-related motor behaviors, allows for a more nuanced understanding of the disorder. This approach facilitates the identification of patterns and anomalies in motor activity that are often characteristic of ADHD, thereby contributing to more precise diagnostics and tailored treatment strategies. Our approach focuses on utilizing AI techniques to deeply analyze patients' motor information and cognitive processes, aiming to improve ADHD diagnosis and treatment strategies. On the ADHD dataset, the model significantly improved accuracy to 98.21% and recall to 93.86%, especially excelling in EEG data processing with accuracy and recall rates of 96.62 and 95.21%, respectively, demonstrating precise capturing of ADHD characteristic behaviors and physiological responses. These results not only reveal the great potential of our model in improving ADHD diagnostic accuracy and developing personalized treatment plans, but also open up new research perspectives for understanding the complex neurological logic of ADHD. In addition, our study not only suggests innovative perspectives and approaches for ADHD treatment, but also provides a solid foundation for future research exploring similar complex neurological disorders, providing valuable data and insights. This is scientifically important for improving treatment outcomes and patients' quality of life, and points the way for future-oriented medical research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

ACT-RADHDartificial intelligencemotor informationRandom ForestTCN

Identifiers

PMID38716252
PMCPMC11075529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.