Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716188›Full record

ReviewVeterinarni medicina2022

New perspectives in a microstructure study of the bovine and bubaline claw.

Bruno Moraes Assis, Luisa Pucci Bueno Borges, Kleber Fernando Pereira, Caroline Rocha de Oliveira Lima, Luiz Antonio Franco da Silva, Pedro Paulo Maia Teixeira, Rogerio Elias Rabelo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinarni medicina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruno Moraes AssisVeterinary and Animal Science School, Goiás Federal University, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Luisa Pucci Bueno BorgesVeterinary Institut, Pará Federal University, PA, Brazil.
Kleber Fernando PereiraVeterinary Hospital, Goiás Federal University, Regional Jataí, Jataí, GO, Brazil.
Caroline Rocha de Oliveira LimaVeterinary Science School, Goiás State University of Jataí Campus, Jataí, GO, Brazil.
Luiz Antonio Franco da SilvaVeterinary and Animal Science School, Goiás Federal University, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Pedro Paulo Maia TeixeiraVeterinary Institut, Pará Federal University, PA, Brazil.
Rogerio Elias RabeloVeterinary Hospital, Goiás Federal University, Regional Jataí, Jataí, GO, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The techniques of microtomography (Micro-CT), confocal laser scanner microscopy (CLSM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), nanoindentation - Vickers hardness (Nano-VH) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) are undeniably important to the modern study of bovine podiatry. These techniques are also employed in engineering, physics and in the assessment of biomaterials used in reconstructive or experimental surgeries in bovine and bubaline claws. Although studies involving these analyses are still inconspicuous in veterinary medicine, these technologies represent a new paradigm in this area, enabling the development of new lines of research. The objective of this review is to gather information about the microstructural aspects of bovine and bubaline claws, concerning the intratubular and extratubular keratin, which is responsible for the physical and mechanical structure of the claw capsule. This study elucidates different methods used to evaluate the hooves of healthy and sick animals through a micrometric analysis and nano-scale analyses. We would like to emphasise that the described techniques can be applied to study other species.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopyconfocal laser scanner microscopymicrotomographynanoindentationX-ray fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID38716188
PMCPMC11071138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.