Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716167›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasite.

Mark Johnson, Sasha Tetzlaff, Aron Katz, Jinelle Sperry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark JohnsonEngineer Research and Development Center Champaign Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-945X
Sasha TetzlaffEngineer Research and Development Center Champaign Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-6573
Aron KatzEngineer Research and Development Center Champaign Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-9773
Jinelle SperryEngineer Research and Development Center Champaign Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-1900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has been successfully used across freshwater ecological parasitology to inform management of ecologically and economically important species. However, most studies have used species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays to detect target taxa. While generally effective, this approach limits the amount of community and management-supporting data that can be obtained from eDNA samples. If eDNA metabarcoding could be conducted with the same accuracy of a single species approach, researchers could simultaneously detect a target species while obtaining vast community data from eDNA samples. We sampled 38 freshwater sites on Fort McCoy, Wisconsin and compared qPCR to metabarcoding for eDNA detection of the ectoparasitic gill louse

Indexed as

eDNAmetabarcodingoccupancy modelingqPCRSalmincola edwardsii

Identifiers

PMID38716167
PMCPMC11074384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.