Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716147›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2024

The evolving pattern of the monoclonal protein improves the IMWG 2/20/20 classification for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma.

Anna de Daniel, Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato, Natalia Tovar, M Teresa Cibeira, David F Moreno, Aina Oliver-Caldés, Ignacio Isola, Ester Lozano, Joan Bladé, Laura Rosiñol and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Multiple Myeloma Unpacked.Hematological oncology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna de DanielAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-7568-2527
Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-LobatoAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5694-0921
Natalia TovarAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
M Teresa CibeiraAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4036-754X
David F MorenoAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Aina Oliver-CaldésAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-5420
Ignacio IsolaHospital Sant Joan de Déu Catalonia Spain.
Ester LozanoInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) Barcelona Spain.
Joan BladéAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-3405
Laura RosiñolAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-9239
Carlos Fernández de LarreaAmyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-9255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2/20/20 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) score is the most employed risk score in clinical practice to evaluate the risk of progression from smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to symptomatic multiple myeloma. However, it faces a serious limitation: The risk score is applied at diagnosis and cannot be reapplied. Since a dynamic accurate patient risk assessment for progression is necessary, we aimed to investigate whether the detection of an evolving pattern in serum M-protein (SMP) improves the identification of high-risk patients. Eighty-three patients diagnosed with SMM between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were initially classified applying the 2/20/20 IMWG score at baseline and later reclassified depending on the presence of an SMP evolving pattern into six groups. We regrouped the patients into three final risk groups: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk. The risk of progression at two years for the high-risk group was 88% and all patients had progressed at 4 years. The performance measurements were superior for the new 2/20/20-Evolving score independently for the detection of high-risk patients. We show that the sequential measurement of the SMP is a noninvasive and widely available test that improves the 2/20/20 IMWG risk score.

Identifiers

PMID38716147
PMCPMC11072197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.