Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38716051›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2024

Genetic polymorphisms, biomarkers and signaling pathways associated with septic shock: from diagnosis to therapeutic targets.

Mingzheng Wu, Bobin Mi, Liu Liu, Haoli Ma, Cheng Jiang, Shan Jiang, Yulin Li, Yan Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mingzheng WuEmergency Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-4510
Bobin MiDepartment of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430022, China.
Liu LiuCollege of Education of Hubei University, 368 Youyi Avenue, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430062, Hubei Province, China.
Haoli MaDepartment of Biological Repositories, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China.
Cheng JiangEmergency Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430061, China.
Shan JiangEmergency Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430061, China.
Yulin LiEmergency Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430061, China.
Yan ZhaoEmergency Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Septic shock is a severe form of sepsis characterized by high global mortality rates and significant heritability. Clinicians have long been perplexed by the differential expression of genes, which poses challenges for early diagnosis and prompt treatment of septic shock. Genetic polymorphisms play crucial roles in determining susceptibility to, mortality from, and the prognosis of septic shock. Research indicates that pathogenic genes are known to cause septic shock through specific alleles, and protective genes have been shown to confer beneficial effects on affected individuals. Despite the existence of many biomarkers linked to septic shock, their clinical use remains limited. Therefore, further investigation is needed to identify specific biomarkers that can facilitate early prevention, diagnosis and risk stratification. Septic shock is closely associated with multiple signaling pathways, including the toll-like receptor 2/toll-like receptor 4, tumor necrosis factor-α, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B, mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor κB, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription, mammalian target of rapamycin, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain-associated protein 3 and hypoxia-induced-factor-1 pathways. Understanding the regulation of these signaling pathways may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets for the development of novel drugs to treat sepsis or septic shock. In conclusion, identifying differential gene expression during the development of septic shock allows physicians to stratify patients according to risk at an early stage. Furthermore, auxiliary examinations can assist physicians in identifying therapeutic targets within relevant signaling pathways, facilitating early diagnosis and treatment, reducing mortality and improving the prognosis of septic shock patients. Although there has been significant progress in studying the genetic polymorphisms, specific biomarkers and signaling pathways involved in septic shock, the journey toward their clinical application and widespread implementation still lies ahead.

Indexed as

BiomarkerGene polymorphismPathogenic geneSepsisSeptic shockSignaling pathway

Identifiers

PMID38716051
PMCPMC11074594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.