ArticleCureus2024
Preliminary Investigation of the Efficacy and Indications of Proton Beam Therapy for Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its metastases and define the criteria for eligibility. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who had a histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, had progressed to stage IV, and underwent PBT for both the primary and some metastatic lesions between 2017 and 2022. PBT was performed using the passive scattering technique.
resultsSixteen patients (median age, 72 years; range, 55-85 years) were enrolled. All patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at the initiation of PBT. The median duration from the date of stage IV diagnosis to the initiation of PBT was 5.8 (range, 0.4-13.5) months. Three patients had been diagnosed as having recurrent stage IV cancer at other institutions before their referral to our hospital because they had local recurrence and distant metastases after the resection of the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was as follows: pre-PBT, 0, 1, 2, and 3 lines in 4, 7, 4, and 1 patients, respectively; concurrent with PBT, 0 and 1 line in 11 and 5 patients, respectively; post-PBT, 0 and 1 line in 5 and 5 patients, respectively; and unknown, 6 patients. The median survival times (MSTs) from the date of stage IV diagnosis for the with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumor were 11.4 and 20.1 months, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the performance status (PS) levels (
conclusionPBT is indicated when the number of metastases is limited to ≤ 4 lesions and all tumors can be irradiated within the smallest possible number of irradiation fields that can be performed within the patient's tolerable time, which is a subjective duration that depends on the patient's reaction during each session. It may be a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.