ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Controlled Accelerated Rehabilitation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common sports injuries in the knee region. Currently, anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft and controlled accelerated rehabilitation is a frequently used treatment approach. This study aims to add to the literature the early and mid-term clinical results of the controlled accelerated rehabilitation program we implemented in our clinic to enable patients to return to their daily activities faster after ACL reconstruction. Methodology In this retrospective study, 51 patients (50 males, 1 female) diagnosed with ACL tear and undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft were included in our study. In the femoral fixation of the graft, the transfix method was used in 22 patients and the Endobutton-CL method was used in 29 patients. A controlled accelerated rehabilitation program developed by Shelbourne was employed with some modifications to the patients. Clinical evaluation of patients was performed using Lysholm, Cincinnati, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring systems. Results The mean postoperative follow-up period was 18.7 months (range = 6-36 months). During the physical examination, Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift, 49 (96%) patients achieved excellent or good results, while only two (5%) patients experienced fair clinical outcomes. On clinical assessment using the Lysholm and IKDC scoring systems, 50 (98%) patients demonstrated excellent or good results, whereas only one (2%) patient showed fair results. Excellent and good outcomes were observed in all patients using the Cincinnati scoring system. We found a significant decrease in Tegner activity score pre-surgery, which significantly increased post-surgery. Conclusions The combination of Endobutton and cross-pin for femoral fixation and staples and interference screw for tibial fixation is thought to be safe in patients undergoing controlled accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. The implementation of controlled accelerated rehabilitation enables patients to return to their social lives earlier without resulting in clinically poor outcomes in grafts and implants applied in the early and middle stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.