ArticleTransplantation direct2024
A Decade of Liver Transplantation in the United States: Drivers of Discard and Underutilization.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pushing the Limit for Marginal Grafts in the Era of Machine Perfusion: A Tale of HOPE From a Leading Italian Institution.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Machine Perfusion Across Marginal Liver Grafts: Benefits and Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Deep-learning-Assisted Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Evaluation for Pre-transplant Human Liver Graft Quality and Transplant Suitability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Development of a Donor-Based Predictive Model for Pancreas Non-Utilization Among Deceased Donor Transplants in the US.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Liver transplant donor-recipient matching with offline reinforcement learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Donor Time to Death and DCD Liver Transplant Outcomes: Challenging the Dogma That Shorter Is Better.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of the Photographic Assessment of Donor Liver Steatosis in Transplantation Using Artificial Intelligence.Clinical transplantation · 2026Review
- Cryopreservation Strategies to Improve Access to Organ Transplantation.Transplantation · 2026Review
- Pre-Donation Cardiac Arrest and Liver Transplantation Outcomes: Implications for Ischemic Preconditioning.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- An Iterative Design Approach to Development of an Ex Situ Normothermic Multivisceral Perfusion Platform.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Organ shortage remains a major challenge for the field of transplantation. Maximizing utilization and minimizing discard of available organs is crucial to reduce waitlist times. Our aim was to investigate the landscape of liver recovery, discard over the past decade in the United States, and identify areas to reduce organ discard. Methods: This study used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients United Network for Organ Sharing database to analyze the rates and associated reasons of discarded organs from 2010 to 2021. All deceased donors were evaluated, and data were analyzed by organ type, year, and region. Organ disposition was analyzed by year and region. Donor demographics and liver biopsy data were also analyzed. Results: The volume of liver transplantation increased steadily, with a 44% increase from 2010 to 2021. Donation after circulatory death transplantation increased by 239%, comprising 10.6% of transplants in 2021, yet discard rates remained high at 30% for this donor subset. For all donor types, the liver discard rate has remained stable around 10% despite a 74% increase in available donors. Seventy percent of liver discards were attributed to organ factors, with biopsy findings accounting for 40% of all discards. Of livers that were biopsied, 70% had macrosteatosis of <30%. Conclusions: Analysis of trends in transplantation and discard allow for identifying areas of underutilization. Donation after circulatory death livers have expanded the pool of transplanted livers but remain discarded at high rates. Significant differences remain in discard rates between geographic regions. We identify several areas to lower the discard rates. The expanding role of machine perfusion may allow for utilization of previously discarded organs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.